They have it in English. It's called "word vomit"

Also useful words: succinct, concise. Sometimes I use both. Maybe I'll ise all three: be succinct, terse, and concise.

This reads too much like a Soviet Russia joke. The irony is intense.

> Tailwind is a ~~load-bearing~~ very important part of the stack

This is beautiful. Art, even. And it speaks to my very soul.

I've come to call this language "Claudese English" (or Claudish)

Recently I've started using GLM models and noticed they aren't very claudish (just a little bit, compared to DeepSeek which is extremely claudish)

I received an email for it.

OCR now comes built in with Spectacle, the default screenshot utility for KDE Plasma and it can copy the result right away.

I've recently started PI, and after installing a couple extensions + writing a couple more it became enough for me. All I need is just a plan mode, and I installed that.

I'm in the same boat. I haven't found sub agents flows useful.

It's less witch-hunting and more AI-text-fatigue and consequently, overtuned brain-alarms to alert us against the danger of wasting time. That it's triggered by the benign smoke of a rice cooker is an unfortunate side effect.

Honestly — it's annoying — and you're right to pushback on this. One Caveat worth mentioning: AI fatigue is real, and worth handling. It directly affects what's load bearing in the community — The discussion itself.

The fact that I can produce the previous paragraph is evidence enough that LLMs are frying my brain.

I respectfully disagree.

Good content, regardless of who generated it, should be cherished.

A community that is affected by LLM generated text but otherwise good content is not worth being part of.

The corollary is also true. Hollow content generated by a human or an LLM needs pushback. I agree with you as long as the same standards are applied for humans as well.

Yes, I do understand that many people hate the way AI speaks.

But I'd like to remind you of other times in history when one group hated the way another group speaks.

Was it rational? Or was it tribalism?

I'm not saying it's definite - but I am seeing a pattern.

When English is not your native language, I find the accusation a compliment.

It means my content was linguistically well-structured that people confuse it to be machine generated. What more praise can one expect :)