Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | OneManHorde's commentslogin

I am sure this is a nice article, but I'm always surprised when something with a hard paywall makes it this high up on HN. Does everybody but me have a Financial Times subscription?



I guess most promote the title by sentiment.


IBM Plex Mono totally slaps. Look at those braces!


These are specifically not Bills of Material, but general (LLM-generated, it seems) lists of the kinds of parts involved in things. No specific part numbers are indexed, and things like "Bare PCB" are not usefully-broken-down; FR4 is quite different than what you'd use for a high-frequency RF board, so saying bare PCBs are "$1 to $200" is not at all helpful.

I like the idea implied by the name, but this is more like a "Vaguely How Stuff Works dot com" than that.


Microsoft is so broken that an employee finds it easier to write a blog post about a documentation improvement than simply making that improvement? Explains a lot. "Conway's Flaw?"


Raymond's important and high up enough that he probably only needs the approval of three AIs and five managers to publish a blog - updating documentation likely needs twice that.


the blog says the documentation improvement was made in 2020? presumably not by the post author either


From the article:

> The documentation should open with something like this:

>> The callback function must perform its work quickly without blocking. If you need to do complex work or synchronize with other threads or processes, do the work asynchronously, such as by using System Worker Threads.

A change was made, but not the change that Raymond thinks would explain why the list is there anyway.


He used his blog to queue the work to be executed asynchronously by another MS worker that reads it


And, since he isn't waiting on the reply, he is following the rule for the callback.


Always been that way


Highly-deformable materials for bio-sensors. "This limitation impedes applications" once again missing from the abstract, but this could easily have deployed that line.


Still waiting. Maybe some day.


Baffling number of total-paywall links on the front page here these days.


Can someone explain who this person is and why this is relevant? People crash out all the time; you can seek balance without "cold turkey", unless they find no value in the web at all, in which case why bother to post about it? Who is the audience of this website, if this is their last post?


I think this is the author submitting it himself. The blog has lots of published entries with links under the same user.

A one paragraph rant at the top of HN (at least as it displayed to me) probably shouldn't be there, but FWIW the post did resonate a little with me if OP is reading this


This is an extremely online community. It makes sense that this small post would resonate with some readers, in my opinion.


Mental health is a problem in the US and not properly addressed. Some people find an outlet in writing a blog. Almost anything that helps is good in my opinion, outside of violence.

There are also a bunch of whiny people who can’t handle life or go ballistic if their “wrong” president is elected or society does not agree with their little pet opinion of how the world should be. Unfortunately HackerNews is full of this second category. That’s why it is trending here.

It’s difficult to know which category this one is, but since the first category can lead to really bad outcomes, it’s best to assume good intentions and I won’t judge. Unfortunately, statistically speaking ONLY, this could be the second category.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: