Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | allarm's commentslogin

Oh, my, indeed! That's gonna traumatize the poor dude for life.

But this isn't perceived as emphasis at all. If I wanted to emphasize something, I'd be more likely to use something like *bitch* or something along those lines. Replacing a letter with an asterisk comes across as self-censorship, which is pretty silly - just use a different word if you're that uncomfortable with swearing.

You're just mixing up completely different things and thinking you're saying something meaningful. In reality, you're just confusing yourself and those around you.

> Layer-3 only

huh? 1.2.3.0/23 is a valid host address, it doesn't have to be Layer-3 only or whatever. it's just basic subnetting.


Use Apple TV for that.

If you want true, verifiable privacy and control, it's not an Apple TV that you need. Any old laptop or desktop computer can be used to stream content from the Internet using a Web browser or other "apps."

E.g. Netflix doesn't let you to stream 4k video in browser afaik. So no, it's not a good option.

Desktop OS also don't support Dolby Vision or fancy spatial audio formats.

Trifecta: Piracy + Local media server + Streaming device, either Apple TV/Android TV (without internet access).

No loss of quality, devices that could spy on you, don't, and those that would spy on you, can't. The only trade-off is some convenience.


It does let you do that, but only on platforms where they can enforce HDCP. So e.g. Edge on Windows or Safari on macOS work fine, and I think Chrome recently joined the list too. But not on Linux.

I.e. spend more money to do things the TV can perfectly well do. We should make the spying illegal so we can use the devices we buy to their full potential without being sold to advertisers. "Give money to this other company that may or may not also be collecting data and may also sell you out in the future" is a suboptimal solution.

I don't think we can do anything substantial. So I'm going to just use this "suboptimal" solution.

No, we should decouple the display hardware from the playback device. Spying or not, the playback part will be obsolete long before the display part.

Oh you don't say )

Lol even after 6 days you haven't posted any supporting information, so who's misinforming here? :)

I now did, so they were. Sue me for having a semblance of a life outside of HN.

Too late for that!

The purpose of reading is to challenge your mind, literally the cognitive load. If slang from 20 years ago is preventing you from reading a book, that’s a sign of mental laziness.


Many/most people don't read for a mental workout.


That's also a sign of mental laziness.


That's true. And that's exactly why we should blame Google's employees - they are the ones to blame for what's happening.


I believe in the trickle down theory of blame for corporate malfeasance. Starting with the CEOs and VPs and C-level executives and working down until the cancer is removed is, in my opinion, the only way to cure the issue.


It didn't "came off that way". You literally decided to speak up about something that has nothing to do with you.


It's a discussion forum, if you don't like discussing then don't comment. No one needs your permission to comment on your posts.


I don't disagree, but no one forces you to be a jerk. Don't act surprised when you receive a pushback for that.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: