My understanding is subscription usage generally has free cache reads, but I'm not sure if maybe Fable was different in that regard.

The fact that we don't know is part of the problem. Subscription usage has always been pretty opaque.

I saw the whole Cloudflare Pay thing and had the exact same thoughts - this has to be some sort of phishing...

> I couldn't end up fixing it so I tossed it out.

Was the warranty support not able to repair or replace it? I haven't ran into the need to contact them yet so I am curious about how good or bad they are...

Sorry, how does new mouse firmware open this up...? USB/HID is a standard that anyone can implement, right? Is it that hard to implement a HID mouse emulator?

it's hard enough that someone else having done and open-sourcing makes it easier for anyone else that wants it. It means you don't have to do that work.

I think this has to do with their 2.4G dongle for their wireless keyboards - it shows up as a DirectInput (but not XInput) controller for me on Windows for whatever reason. The keyboard itself doesn't though.

As for Reduce Transparency, next iOS version has a proper slider to adjust the transparency of Liquid Glass - worth playing with for anyone on the beta

I think that's what it's meant to be...

With OpenRouter this is pretty easy to see - each model page has various providers listed along with an icon marking providers with zero data retention, and the price. You can also set up an account-wide "guardrail" to prevent routing to non-ZDR providers.

OpenAI and Anthropic also claim they don't retain data. I'm not sure what it would take for me to trust any of these inference companies, and why I should trust them more than the big ones.

I trust both OpenAI And Anthropic, they have literal billions to lose if someone finds out they've been training with in-house corporate data.

Just the GDPR/CCPA fines alone WILL bankrupt both companies.

Cloudflare Turnstile, if you're already using Cloudflare (or not!): https://www.cloudflare.com/application-services/products/tur...

„I don’t use any of GitHub’s non-git features, so if you use them you have a problem”

Who are you quoting?

That was paraphrasing, rather than quoting.

The post being replied to essentially said “I don't use the features that have been regularly broken in recent times, or where the features I do use [core git] were broken it luckily didn't affect me, so anyone thinking of leaving has a mental problem”.

Or to paraphrase the old joke:

Q: How many programmers does it take to change a lightbulb?

A: The sunlight through the windows here is working fine, if you can't see where you are that must be a “you” problem.

"Writing software doesn't require GitHub". Well, if they do not need whatever is specific to github and claim that someone who sorely lacks these features has a mental problem...

To be fair, the author of the post said the same thing. From the other thread on HN, they themselves said: "Nobody should cry over a SaaS, of all things. But GitHub has meant so much more to me than that (all laid out in the post). I have an unhealthy relationship with it. "