Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | archermarks's commentslogin

This is effectively how dual numbers work! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_number


Dual numbers are basically big/little O notation. They combine beautifully with Robinson's NSA to give the most 18th century-like approach to deriving integral/derivative formulas that I know. And it's fully rigorous!


True. Knuth had a paper where he suggests using (a slightly modified) O notation for teaching calculus.

https://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/calc

From the Arxiv paper:

> Students have to memorize a diversity of processes for essentially performing the same task.

Is that true for differentiation ? I don't recall having to memorize many things, just how differentiation composes over +,-,×,÷, function composition and the differential of a few standard forms.

Symbolic integration, on the other hand, is a whole can of worms.


If you've been working on the issue for 6 months you should understand it well enough to answer in your own words.


I didn't say fix, I said context. As in "you are using an established thing the wrong way" which is most questions people ask. Edited


Another anecdote: I am a big nvim user and set everything up three years ago and basically haven't touched it since. At this point I'm a bit afraid I won't be able to fix it if something breaks lol.

I do think the culture of tweaking constantly without ever doing real work exists, but it's far less common than it seems online. People who make posts about their neovim configs all the time are certainly more likely to be in this camp than people not posting at all.


I was super into vim in college (20 years ago now, jeez). I started off like that but then transitioned to basically using “default vim” (plus support for a few external tools like ctags or cscope). For basically this reason!


There's a good People Make Games video about this from a few days ago

https://youtu.be/Is8N7B9b0GQ


It's funny that I watched this less than an hour ago, and I click on hackernews and bam it's #1 on the front page.

Probably someone else must've also watched this in the past few hours or days.


The world is increeeeeeedibly small with likeminded people (sometimes at least, which is most of the times).


More likely, you could track people who visit the same websites across different apps and websites and feed them similar content on other platforms.


You're talking about 2 phenomenons that I love - the tendency to spot related things in noise due to bias, and hackernews community


> the tendency to spot related things in noise due to bias

The Baader–Meinhof phenomenon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_illusion


reticular activating system


I remember seeing a video on Jerry’s Map from nearly 20 years ago.


This one of my most favourite youtube documentaries i've seen in a while


You know, it'd have been amazing if TFA has not opened with that video. So instead of clicking the link to view TFA, you went off and dug up the exact same link in TFA???


Oh, I see that there's two TFAs. The one in the description has the video, but this main one doesn't - http://www.jerrysmap.com/the-map


The main linked article actually does not have that video; the article linked from in the description does have it. Not surprising that someone missed it.


For me it doesn't. Perhaps it's a cookie setting? Anyway, lovely video.


I made a nice little CLI tool for testing the subjunctive in Italian. Claude code spun off a bunch of Claude API calls to generate example sentences with fill-in-the-blank spots for the correctly conjugated verb. Having an AI generate a prompt for and call out to other AIs was a bit surreal!


Nice article! The generated images make me so nostalgic for the early days of AI image generation. DeepDream and others had such uncanny, interesting generations.


Yeah, generative AI used to be wild, alien creativity and not something that made art kids furious.

I wonder if models can be trained for "high-temperature" purposes. I'd rather have a model which can surprise me than one which can predicably produce generic mediocre results. I mean you can run them on high temperature of course, but it doesn't seem like it's optimized for that.


Really interesting article! I knew about the phase polyphenism but the forced cannibalistic march theory was new to me.


This paper is hilarious


I loved this article, would recommend y'all read it instead of skimming to the end to find the bread


I didn't know that! Do you have any references that go into more depth here? I'd be curious how the architect and train it.


I believe D. A. Jimenez and C. Lin, "Dynamic branch prediction with perceptrons" is the paper which introduced the idea. It's been significantly refined since and I'm not too familiar with modern improvements, but B. Grayson et al., "Evolution of the Samsung Exynos CPU Microarchitecture" has a section on the branch predictor design which would talk about/reference some of those modern improvements.


Thank you, I'll give them a read.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: