Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mcdonje's commentslogin

According to the android app store, Nearby Glasses doesn't collect any data, while ZuckOff collects app activity.

Why would I want a bluetooth scanner to phone home? Seems untrustworthy. Nearby Glasses wins from a data safety perspective.


Huh, I don't see that in the permissions list. I do see:

    - run foreground service with the type "connectedDevice"
    - discover and pair nearby Bluetooth devices
    - run foreground service
    - control vibration
    - Google Play billing service
    - run at startup
    - Google Play license check
    - have full network access
    - view network connections
    - ask to ignore battery optimizations
    - prevent phone from sleeping
    - connect to paired Bluetooth devices
    - show notifications
I also see "In-app purchases" for "$9.99 - $24.99 per item", which is more of a turnoff for me personally.

It's not in the permission list, it's in the "data safety" section on Google Play

Even if that kind of corruption isn't there, these charities are still a net negative for society. Why do the super rich rail against taxes but then donate all of their money to family foundations? There are multiple reasons. Pull on that thread.

>(2002)

I wonder what apps have implemented this now that a few years have passed.


VQSort users include numpy, XLA (for sparse tensors), ScaNN:

https://sourcegraph.com/search?q=context:global+hwy/contrib/...


oops, 2022

There was a lot of one-upsmanship at the time. People did it because it was hard. When it wasn't difficult to do anymore, they stopped because it wasn't actually good clean design.

Also, early on, there was an idea that cyberspace should resemble meatspace so the meats don't get confused. That's no longer much of a concern.


> they stopped because it wasn't actually good clean design.

Unfortunately, they didn't replace it with good, clean design.


Pretty sure they said "go gimp" ironically


You can have multiple instances with Darktable.


I'm on Debian, which is of course behind. I tried installing the flatpak, which is up to date, but the packager removed the AI parts. The only option I have (short of moving to Arch or similar) is AppImage, which doesn't integrate well with the DE.

I get being against AI, but Darktable is very responsible about it according to their release notes. Local only, opt-in only, no nagging. It's not like Adobe trying to push AI on you when you don't want it.


One way to get the AppImage to integrate better would be to install appimaged.

Another way to get the up-to-date version on Debian would be to use Nix (install nix, add the stable or unstable channel or whatnot, and make darktable installable)


GearLever is handy too, though they seem moderately different in goals and I'm not familiar with the details


I built from source, on Ubuntu. There are few rough edges -- look for hints on the pixls.us forum. And git-checkout at the release point for version 5.6, not TOT.


Have you tried Darktable's own Debian packages from the OpenSuSE Build Service: https://software.opensuse.org/download.html?project=graphics...


Darktable is great. You can easily do pro-level photo editing. Anything you need for editing RAW files, you can do. The modules are powerful. The UI is good. There is a learning curve, but there are also learning curves for the paid software options.


Darktable is top class.


I wish PWAs took off, or a "desktop" environment for phones and tablets that allows me to save a simple website shortcut as an app.

I want my phone to be the portal to the places I want to go to and the things I want to see. I want to have the same experience going to a web app or website I regularly visit as with a normal app.

Like, I want to click on an icon and be there. I don't want to click on the browser and then find the tab.

Also, I want PWAs and website shortcuts to be first class citizens. I want a normal icon, not one that has some sort of visual marker that it's not a normal app.

It's been an ongoing annoyance, but it's getting to be more commonplace of an issue because there are a lot of people building cool things on atproto, and they generally start as a web app before they maybe build a phone app.


You can already do this, browser allow you to add a website as an icon and it acts completely like an app. Even iOS allows this, try adding HN to your home screen.


It’s too bad Apple made the option to install a website as a webapp so hard to find. It’s now hidden in ‘Share’ > ‘View more’ > ‘Add to home screen’

This has nothing to do with ‘sharing’ something


Yes, exactly. I was looking for it for ages the other day, it really does feel like they hid it intentionally.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: