Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rotis's commentslogin

Maybe it's just a secret cabal of rogue agents downloading LibreOffice for no particualr reason whatsoever? I mean there is a precedent already: those fellas hijacked some poor wiki.


In many (most?) companies it also takes nontrivial amount of time to patch potentially affected systems. In my company half IT department got recently an email that we need to urgently patch all Windows servers because of some critical CVE. I checked it. The description was maybe 3 lines and it said this affected domain controllers only. I raised this with security team and they said that in this case we don't need to patch everything. Now if we had to do this, it would force us to spend nontrivial time on unplanned patching. That this in itself disorganizes our operations can not be ignored. So comparatively me doing some legwork and checking the CVE was trivial effort and saved a lot of busywork for the department as a whole. That time we got lucky.


If something is hard do it more often so you get good at it.

While this time you avoided something, it sounds like you need to figure out your patching process ASAP. There is every reason to believe a major issue will affect everything in the near future.


Later on he gives an example of Blackboard software that was very disliked. So I don't see what was unique in his perspective either. To me this article is not very focused and feels mostly like rambling. The core idea that we get accustomed to bugs/quality in software we use is sound. Just the article needs streamlining or better a complete rewrite.


Sure. I don't give a damn about them. But Phil Collins man. I love reviewing his body of work before I get worked up. Obvously we cannot cut him, because I need him. So how do you decide what to leave out?


This site's trustworthiness when it goes for pre-aquisition data was disputed here already:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086786


Thanks for sharing this, had no idea. This information changes my perspective a lot.


Reminds me of this story from Windows land by Bruce Dawson (and similar on his blog):

63 Cores Blocked by Seven Instructions: https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2019/10/20/63-cores-blocke...

Looks like Linux isn't immune to these types of problems.


So the AIs end up being silly like in this video?

10 AIs Play Mafia

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhBtg-lyKdo


The cheap ones definitely do! The flagship models tend to be pretty decent.


I have problems reconciling this story with the Amazon one from few days ago. If we take both for truth doesn't that basically imply Amazon researchers got scared by the ‘Fix this code’ prompt first and then spooked the feds? Shouldn't we make fun of those researchers first? I don't know. I feel there lies a lie somewhere in the open.


Agentic engineering? Vibe coding? That is so yesterday. Chain-of-thought flow is where it is at now. You heard it here first folks. Early examples of such phenomena include Rube Goldberg machines



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: