I wonder when the people will get that intelligence is not only directed at the external, but only really starts when you look at the internal (joy, pleasure, traumas, taboos, awkwardness, abuse, trust etc.). Look up the word "interoception".

I wonder when the people will get that intelligence is not only directed at the external, but only really starts when you look at the internal (joy, pleasure, traumas, taboos, awkwardness, abuse etc.). Look up the word "interoception".

Met him today at FrOSCon in Bonn, amazing guy.

Don't take my word for it, but to me it looks like yet another abstraction layer.

And in practice people don't change their cloud providers that often(yes it happens, but USUALLY not).

And again, in practice you should learn this layer and layer from real provider and know how things are mapped from one to another one. Because, again, in practice you will support real k8s cluster or something like that, and you'll need to support and solve problems THERE, but applying fixes in a different domain language HERE.

I wonder when people will finally understand that social networks are also basically just fancy SaaS applications; I already predicted it half a year ago: https://blog.hermesloom.org/p/the-next-bubble-that-will-pop-...

Open for feedback :)

How does personal data sovereignty help when you need a surgeon, or come into conflict with someone whose ledgers say they have control over the stuff your ledgers say you do?

Your answer?

Good Q. In the meantime: Wah was going for the Buxton 100, lah.

That's an odd malayanglish; drop the comma and the ending be perfect (for starters :)

https://old.reddit.com/r/Liverpool/comments/14qshol/who_stil...

all (most?) of Scouser "la" save the parts that are shared with "mate" (or "lad" for the boomers/gen Z(?)) == the rising tone variant.

https://old.reddit.com/r/Liverpool/comments/14qshol/who_stil...

Indeed it's sometimes spelled "lar" in the suburbs. Besserwisserism is a security vuln =p

U: Almost equivalent to Swedish softening "liksom" (recall the Hofstede chart ;)

Oh of course I am, do you think I would need AI editors otherwise?

Maybe you are not as good a judge of difficulty of what you are proposing and others competence as you believe.

But I do know the secret: It's going beyond lines of code, deeper into the functional structure of it

So of course great kudos to the developers of Cursor, Antigravity, Windsurf, OpenCode and all the other editors. I’m personally using Cursor daily. But already for many months, I have been frustrated why they still operate on the level of lines of code. That seems so “last millennium” to me. Now that we have all these amazing data structures in computing, why are we not doing anything with them? Why are coding editors still working on the level of text instead of syntax trees? Or even more abstractly, couldn’t they work on the level of a cross-language notation?

That's a good point, I will fix that, thanks so much!