Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tgrowazay's commentslogin

Just checked Uber in Los Angeles - it costs $6.95 to go around the corner.

It is anti-bot proof-of-work defence.

When did Google replace their CAPTCHA with Anubis? I've never seen Anubis on Google.

> Update, 8:56 p.m. ET: Shortly after this story was published, the Nexus identity theft service website vanished from the darkweb, replacing its login page with a plain text message that reads, “This service is no longer available.”


In the context of buying from UK, use Delaware (or any no-sales-tax state’s) mail forwarding company.


In that case you'll just pay import tax and its gonna be almost the same price, but 1 month later.


Is it applicable to stock trading?


Maybe if you apply it at a microstructural scale (think seconds) with order book and trade print data from many sources/symbols. Certainly not if you blindly apply it to the time series of the price.


I don't see why not - there are papers which use system identification for modelling stocks.


Some people downvoting you, but I think it is a valuable illustration of IQ gap.

And chances are that humanity at large will be soon trying to follow ai inventions and discoveries not unlike your dog follows your Python code.


I really don’t think IQ has much to do with it. Understanding this stuff is like a skill you practice. Yes, granted, if you had a low IQ your chances of ever understanding it goes down, if you have a high IQ maybe you can gain the prerequisite understanding faster.

A lot of maths is about both being able to wrap your head around hard problems and gaining the prerequisite knowledge to make it easier to do so.


IQ limits your rate of gaining the prerequisite knowledge creating a lifetime ceiling.


For most of their lives, most people have a rate of 0 learning because they aren't even trying to learn it.


Math is literally the most g-loaded thing there is.


I recently saw a photo of an alligator lying on top of a pool floatie shaped like an alligator. That alligator could be trained in every way possible for ten years, and never ever recognize the mutual resemblance.

Like you, I wonder if we will soon cross the boundary where we are the alligator.

(I suspect that we have been the alligator all along, outside the context of AI.)


> which makes GLM-5.2 slightly closer to Opus 4.5 than Opus 4.6 is

So, glm is more related to opus than opus to opus?


Greenfield projects


That’s what Singer’s civilization wants you to think before they send a Photoid or Dual-Vector foil (but later would require a supervisor’s approval which is a PITA)


  > before they send a Photoid
Plenty of services require a Photo ID nowadays.


> This has absolutely nothing to do with burner phones

That is not correct. There a phone farms operating purely on burner phones / disposable sims. Even for legit use cases, this path is often way easier/cheaper than go through official channels.

Use cases range from carrier-NAT proxies at < $1 per GB to text message spam.


But... what does your comment have to do with burner phones?

A burner phone is a phone number whose owner is not officially registered somewhere as the owner.

A spoofed phone number is a false declaration that you're calling from number XXXXXXXXXX when in fact you're calling from YYYYYYYYYY.

You might notice that there is absolutely no relationship between these two ideas. You can be registered and lie about your phone number. You can be unregistered and not lie about your phone number.


There are phone farms that exclusively use burner phones and do not need to spoof caller ID.


Let's recall the claim here:

>>> I think in general the ability to spoof numbers should be banned / controlled. Someone from India should not be allowed to call me with a caller ID from Mayo Clinic.

>> This has absolutely nothing to do with burner phones and the proposed changes won't do anything to change that.

> That is not correct. There a phone farms operating purely on burner phones

This is total nonsense. A phone farm that doesn't spoof caller ID isn't presenting false caller ID.


Wait, you’re right, I think I misread your comment somehow or got it mixed with another comment.

Sorry about that.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: