Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | zwirbl's commentslogin

Still the most stable API on Linux

I still think that it’s one of the great ironies of our time.

Linux itself bends over backwards to avoid breaking userland, to the point where there is a substantial amount of cruft when interacting directly with the kernel.

Only for GNU to say “fuck that” and create a widely mockable situation, one of the worst targets of modern programs for stability… to the point where people start using alternative libc’s specifically to statically link them.

What a monumental failure.


Dynamic linking by default has turned into a premature optimization over time

Just a quirk of the times. GNU made the most optimal solutions of their time, but in the end we still have some tech debt. I think it was inevitable that this would happen with GNU or for that matter any project, since it's not a centralized project like linux and was never going to be since it's not just one piece of software.

Maybe they are drinking their own kool-aid, resulting in less then optimal choices and worse software for everyone and everything


Likely isolated from oxygen in deep water or sediment


It supports LE Audio, might help getting that tech some traction


It compares to lowercase input, so doesn't matter. The rest is still valid



You might not have been paying attention


I think Radiohead said that


The author seems to be a big fan of the current administration in general


It means something, but doesn't imply the existence of a NATO rmy


ok, but now we’re nit-picking about the meaning of “army”. There are “NATO troops” while there aren’t “EU Troops”.

I would still like to understand why previous poster said the EU defense agreement was more robust, I am genuinely curious about what that agreement contains and how well it was respected in the past.


> I am genuinely curious about what that agreement contains and how well it was respected in the past.

Easy enough to find[1]. Here[2] is a nice article which digs a bit deeper into how it might play out.

[1]: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/glossary/mutual-d... (links to the treaty section if you want the text verbatim)

[2]: https://www.politico.eu/article/5-things-to-know-about-the-e...


> ok, but now we’re nit-picking about the meaning of “army”.

You started nitpicking...


Which is just some random number when not relating to how much energy was used


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: