Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

These valuations aren't necessarily just a bet on advertising as we know or imagine it. At least for FB and Google, the assets that give them power to direct attention to ads can potentially be monetized in other ways if ads stop being the most lucrative.

And conversely, if you don't own an asset that redirects a massive amount of attention, you can't launch any kind of product without getting help from someone who does (whether you call that help advertising or not).



If Google's asset was so powerful you'd think their other products would be doing better. (google+, glass, Allo, etc)


even they being failure, almost everyone heard of them.


right, but the point is that those products won't maintain the company valuation.

lots of people have heard about AIM, but it didn't save AOL




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: