Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'd go with a). Very dumb move.


“Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence” said Napoleon.


Never ascribe to Napoleon etc.

https://quoteinvestigator.com/2016/12/30/not-malice/

TL;DR Seems to have been first attributed to 'Napolean' on Usenet in 1997!



so what would comprise the requirements for an adequate explanation of incompetence in this case?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: