Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

most people drive cars, and yet have very little understanding of how it actually works internally. As long as the interfaces are well designed, this works fine for most.

I say the same is for haskell.



That's fine if you use your car for commuting (= casual projects with no special requirements) but not if you want to compete on the race track.

Of course you can optimally keep out of the dependencies, and a lot of people don't even think about digging into them and unnecessary limit themselves, but as I said in my initial comment, every bigger project I worked on involved tweaking dependencies in one way or another.


To run with your analogy — which I don't find particularly constructive anyway — people who are just starting to drive don't start by competing on the race track.


With no prior experience with lisp, I was able to get comfortable in a clojure-only codebase in less than 3 months.


That’s great. Not sure what point you’re making though :)


I'd say rally driving is the best analogy. Not only do you have to drive the car at peak performance, you also have to perform ad hoc repairs halfway through a stage




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: