Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Isn't the "jigsaw identification" essentially similar to the 'personally identifiable information' addressed by GDPR? It seems to me that both constructs stand and fall together.


PII is precisely defined, not pulled out of thin air, and nobody's going to jail because of it. Rich corporations like Amazon are fined for fucking with it though.


All of the data that can be used to identify a person are precisely defined?

Or is it that all of the identity data that someone can be held legally accounted for are precisely defined?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: