That’s how the retroactive victim blaming always works: It is retroactively determined that there were signs, which turns into victim blaming anyone who didn’t predict that those signs would lead to loss of their coins.
You are doing it.
> also as far as I care the btc community members who chose to go with one of the few hardware wallets that wasn't open source were not doing due their diligence.
I can’t tell if you’re confused about the details of this story or if you’re trying to make a point that isn’t landing. You may want to read up on the open source status of the wallet before doing the whole victim blaming song and dance.
That’s how the retroactive victim blaming always works: It is retroactively determined that there were signs, which turns into victim blaming anyone who didn’t predict that those signs would lead to loss of their coins.
You are doing it.
> also as far as I care the btc community members who chose to go with one of the few hardware wallets that wasn't open source were not doing due their diligence.
I can’t tell if you’re confused about the details of this story or if you’re trying to make a point that isn’t landing. You may want to read up on the open source status of the wallet before doing the whole victim blaming song and dance.